|
e-Mail Us
| |
 |
 |
Wayne Perryman on Barak Obama
Visit Wayne's Website at:
http://www.wayneperryman.com
Minister, and former radio talk show
host, Wayne has appeared as a Conservative guest on a number of
shows including C-Span book, and Fox’s Hannity & Colmes,
Index |
|
Books by Rev.
Perryman Click to Select |
|
|
|
Articles by Rev.
Perryman Click to Select |
|
|
|
|
|
Preview of Wayne Perryman's
New Book
The Untold History of Race &
Politics Within the Democratic
Party From 1792-2009
The first four pages
|
As an independent voter and a
fact-finding investigator, I was asked to review and analyze
Obama’s inspirational and fascinating speech on race. Many
believe it is one of the best speeches since Dr. King’s “I
Have a Dream” speech, and I agree. But I have one problem.
He missed the opportunity to set the record straight on two
issues that he brought up during his speech.
1. His first missed opportunity
came one minute and thirtyfour seconds into his speech, when he
referred to the Declaration of Independence and how it was
“stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery…”
Although he follows up and talks
about how slavery “divided the Colonies and brought the
convention to a stalemate,” he failed to point out that
as a nation we were always divided over the issue of
slavery from the time the first slave ship arrived in Jamestown,
Virginia, in 1619, to the end of the Civil War 246
years later.
He should have told the audience,
that there has never been a universal endorsement
of slavery by the white citizens of this country
and that white America has always been split over
the issue of slavery. He could have mentioned that 175
years before the Emancipation Proclamation was signed, the
Mennonite Quakers (white folks) of Germantown, Pennsylvania
passed an anti-slavery resolution in 1688.
It was the first formal protest against slavery in the Western
Hemisphere. Under this resolution, Quakers who participated in
the slave trade were threatened with expulsion.
He should have mentioned that in
1711, sixty-five years before the Declaration of
Independence was signed, colonies passed various pieces of
legislation to outlaw slavery, but their laws were overturned by
the British Crown. He should have said, long before the Civil
War, the issue of slavery was so divisive that whites fought and
killed one another in opposition to and in support of slavery.
Such was the case in Congress and Kansas. In 1856, while white
citizens fought on the streets of Lawrence, Kansas, white
Congressmen literally had fist fights on the floor of the
Senate. Whites tried to include anti-slavery language in the
Declaration of Independence, they debated the issue during the
Constitutional Convention, and when both sides refused to give
in, white churches split, white denominations split, white
families split (some supporting the Union and others the
Confederacy), political parties split and eventually our nation
split, which resulted in the Civil War - and as Lincoln stated
in his June 16, 1858 speech, America remained: “A House
Divided.”
Since the facts clearly show that
we were a “divided nation”
rather than a
“racist nation,” Senator Obama should have told his
listening audience that by 1835 the anti-slavery movement
had over 435,000 members and these white abolitionists
not only fought and gave their lives to end slavery, they
continued their fight after the Civil War and:
(a) They passed three Constitutional Amendments
to end
slavery, give blacks citizenship and the right to
vote;
(b) They ratified these Amendments with the
appproval of
the white citizens in three-fourths of the
states;
(c) They successfully financed and started many
or our historically
Black Colleges which bare their names.
-
And in 1909, they started the NAACP.
Long before Lincoln took office in 1861, whites
had outlawed slavery in Rhode Island, Vermont, Pennsylvania,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey,
Maine, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oregon,
California and Illinois. The only states that remained slave
states were those under Democrat control.
By failing to point out the
massive number of whites who not only opposed slavery but
literally gave their lives to end it and racism, Obama merely
perpetuated the myth and lie that our nation (implying
every white in America) endorsed or approved of slavery and Jim
Crow. He should have made it clear, that it wasn’t every
white—it was primarily the white supporters of the
Democratic Party—the party that became known as the Party
of White Supremacy.
His second missed opportunity came twenty-one
minutes and fourteen seconds into his speech when he made the
following reference to slavery, Jim Crow, and the anger of his
pastor:
• We do not need to recite
here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do
need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that
exist in the African-American community today can be directly
traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that
suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow….
• …The anger is real; it is
powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without
understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of
misunderstanding that exist between the races….
In order to foster a better
understanding of the roots of racism, Obama should
have told his audience that the roots of racism rested in the
soil of the Democratic Party, not in our nation as a whole. He
should have informed Americans that without the political
backing of those who made up and formed the powerful
Democratic Party (a party whose members gave their lives and
spent billions to preserve the institution of slavery and the
system of Jim Crow), slavery would have ended one hundred years
earlier, and Jim Crow would have died in the womb of those who
conceived it. Contrary to public opinion, racism was not
something that the entire white race engaged in. Racism was the
political agenda of a powerful political party – made up of
individuals who chose to use this deadly disease to cover their
own insecurities in their relentless quest for wealth and power.
For years we have been led to believe that the racist party was
the Republican Party. But from 1787 to 2009, historians tell a
different story. The following is their story.
Contact
Rev. Perryman at via his Website address included with his
profile in the index at the top of the page.
Return to Index
Dear Friends:
It is time for Republicans to call a national
conference so they can get their act together and get on the
same page before they open up their mouths and speak on the race
issue. Don't any of these leaders study history? Why do they
say the things that they do?
1. Michael Steele latest statements tying
racism with the Republican Party
2. The governor of Virginia honoring the
Confederacy while ignoring slavery, then apologizing for it -
while the Democrats use the situation to play the race card..
This is so sad. As I
predicted the issue of race will always have a negative impact
on the Republican Party because they do not know how to address
the subject. That's why I wrote my latest book:
Whites, Blacks and Racist Democrats. By the way
the book is doing so well, Amazon.com can't keep enough in stock
and we are already re-printing the book. I am holding out some
for my public appearances, but we are currently rationing out
the book to the bookstores. Unfortunately, there are two groups
of people who are afraid to address the race issue:
the white churches and the white conservatives.
They shouldn't be afraid, they not only have the resources
available they have plenty of black conservatives ready to stand
by their side in this fight. All they have to do is ask for
their assistance. But as of this date, they have not. And this
includes. Rush, Hannity, Sarah Palin, Beck and many of our top
ministers.
I tried to tell the
Republican leaders that the book would be a good tool to deal
with the issue of race, but
while they have completely ignored my counsel and the book, the
grassroots are eating it up. Some buying more than ten at a
time. Over the years the Republican leaders have always ignored
the issue of race, and when the subject is forced on them, they
always put their foot in their mouths by giving the wrong
response with no historical foundation and this is true with our
conservative talk show host.
Some may say, there you go trying to sell
your book. Selling the book is not important, getting the
people the truth about origin of racism and the political power
that sustained is what is important. That's why I give away so
many books. I want people to know the truth even if they cannot
afford to buy the book. It's theirs free.
There needs to a
national conference for conservatives on how to deal with the
race issue. It is one of the most
effective weapons that the Democrats use against Conservatives
and the Tea Party activist and it will be used alot between now
and November. Until such a meeting is conducted,
no Republican leader should address the subject (which will also
be dangerous).
Rev. Wayne Perryman
Return to Index
|
|
|
Our Health
Care Delima: A Simple Solution
March 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
Dear Friends
There is a simple solution to the health care debate. If the
bill is indeed designed for the common citizen, do the
following:
1. Go out and pick 3,000 persons at random
2. Give them each a copy of the 2,700 pages of the health care
bill that is designed for them
3. Give them one week to study the bill
4. At the end of the week test them on the bill to see if they
thoroughly understand it
5. If the majority of them pass the test - sign the bill into
law, but if they flunk the test, scrap the bill and come up
with a new bill that they can read and
understand.
If you won't allow someone to spend your hard earned money to
buy you a pair of shoes without your approval (to see if they
fit or to see if you really like them), why would you let
someone develop a healthcare plan for you, one that you have not
personally approved of or can even understand.
Anyone can write up a proposal and tell you to sign it and
approve of it without having you to read it. This is how they
trapped and obligated uneducated poor black sharecroppers who
made their mark with an X. These poor individuals worked for
years, but could never pay off their debt because they were
merely told what was in the contract rather than reading it
themselves. These individuals learned one lesson: "Thoroughly
read it - before you sign it."
Rev. Wayne Perryman
|
|
Return to Index |
|
|
|
Questions on Health
Care |
|
|
|
Dear Donna
Brazile & News Organizations
I have a few simple
questions about health care, maybe you can help me.
If Medicaid
is the government program designed to provide health care for the
poor and if the government has confessed that they have failed (as
of this date) to sign up eight million uninsured poor individuals
who currently qualify for Medicaid, why do these (poor)
individuals need health insurance when they already have a
government system to cover them (and others who may become poor)?
If the government really cares about the uninsured poor, why are
they waiting for a new bill to become law before they sign up these
eight million poor persons whom they know qualify for
Medicaid
right now? If the government can't sign these individuals up for
Medicaid, how will they ever sign them up for what they call
affordable health insurance? And if they were able to sign them up
for insurance, where will the poor get the money to pay for the
insurance? Will the poor have both insurance and
Medicaid?
Why would they need both?
It is the poor and illegal aliens that go to the emergency room for
medical services and this includes those persons on
Medicaid.
With the poor, it makes no difference whether they have insurance or
not, they are not going to wait for an appointment to see a doctor
when they can go to emergency room to get the same care immediately,
so where are the cost savings?The facts show that most of the
people who are un-insured are poor and since we already have the
Medicaid system to help the poor,
Medicare to help poor
senior citizens and Veteran hospitals to help poor veterans,
why do we need to pass a massive health care reform program to cover
the un-insured poor? We already have systems in place to help
them. We should just make it mandatory for all employees who are
not classified as the working class poor - to pay for
their own health insurance through payroll deduction. The problem
is solved.
As far as the issue of
high premiums are concern, pass tort reform legislation and allow
insurance companies to compete across state lines and tell the
insurance companies that they must cover pre-existing conditions.
That settles costs.
We do not need 1017
pages of legislation to do this - nor do we need another
multi-billion dollar government bureaucracy to monitor health care.
Rev. Wayne Perryman
Return to Index |
|
|
|
Letter to Congress and the Media |
|
|
|
Dear Members of Congress & NBC, ABC, FOX, CNN, MSNBC:
Most Americans agree that there is a need for some type of
Health Care Reform, but not the reforms that
you are proposing.
When you proposed that an additional 2.5% tax be placed on those
who do not have health insurance – we question your concern
and sensitivity for the working class poor.
Why should the working class poor be assessed an additional 2.5%
tax simply because they can’t afford to buy health insurance?
And why should those
that do have the means to purchase
health insurance but choose not to – be taxed and additional
2.5% as well?
Should an out of control Congress that can’t control their own
spending - be telling us how to spend our hard-earned dollars?
A careful view of our history will reveal that
the Congress
of today is much different than the Congress established by our
Founding Fathers.
The records will show that
after the Constitutional Convention, Americans were proud of their
representatives in Congress. You started out with good ideas and
good intentions but over the years your performance has
deteriorated to the point that we now have a
grandiose
government and a comatose Congress – a
government and a Congress that is totally
oblivious
to the working class people who put them in office.
History tells us that the
United States Congress was formed
to represent the needs of the people - and the
United States
Constitution tells us that as a member of Congress you should
meet at least once a year to accomplish
this task.
The
once a year suggests that Congress
should be a part-time job, not a full time job (Article XX Section
2). You have now stretched this supposedly
part time
job into life long careers – Today you spend more time in
Washington
D.C.
with bureaucrats than you do in your own home state with the
common people who elected you.
- Over
the years you [Congress] have developed a reputation of looking
out more for yourselves than for the people whom you were elected
to represent.
Our first members of Congress all had jobs and
businesses in their local communities and when they went to
Washington after the Harvest to do the
nation’s business, they were paid a per diem of $6.00 per day.
Now many of you have no other jobs - and instead of a per diem of
$6.00 a day, you now pay yourselves $174,000 a year with vacations
and benefits that far exceed the benefits of the working class
people who put you in office.
Benefits like
$200,000 just to pay for your hair cuts.
- You
never seem to know just where to draw the line
A few years ago you did the honorable thing by passing legislation
to guarantee Civil Rights for women, the aged, the handicapped and
for the members of various ethnic groups. But your consideration
of extending Miranda rights to captured terrorists,
employment rights to illegal aliens and
sexual orientation
rights to those who engage in private sexual acts - lets us
know, that you have no idea as to where the draw the line when it
comes to passing legislation.
Now you want to control Health Care - How far will you go? And
where will you draw the line?
Tell us:
- Will you pass a
law requiring that we eat healthier foods - and for those who
choose not to do so, will you demand that we pay higher taxes to
cover the increased health care costs for not eating healthy?
-
Will you
eventually decide to deny Senior Citizens health care - because
providing such care for the elderly may drain the system?
Where will you draw the line?
-
Will
you start increasing the taxes on those who do not exercise
regularly because we know that those who are not physically fit
are more susceptible to certain illness?
- Will you start
taxing persons who are over-weight because of the many illness
that are associated with obesity and excessive weight gains?
- Will you start
banning certain foods and closing fast-food restaurants simply
because you feel they are contributing to unhealthy Americans?
- Where will your
intrusion into our personal lives end?
- Keep
in mind, you were never elected to manage our personal lives, you
were elected to manage our government.
And if you truly believe that our government is capable of
handling Health Care, what government agency or program will you
model your Health Care Program after?
Post Office
Hopefully not the Post Office.
Recent reports
indicate that this government agency will lose from $6 to $12
billion dollars this year as they continue to borrow money from
the Federal Financing Bank just to stay in business.
Medicare
Medicare can’t be a model.
This government agency currently has an
estimated $36 trillion dollars in unfunded
liabilities, and no one has faintest idea where the
government is going to get the $36 trillion dollars to cover these
liabilities.
Veteran Administration
After the deplorable conditions that we all saw at the
Walter
Reed Veteran’s Hospital, Will you model your health care
program after the Veteran’s Administration? The
Walter
Reed
Hospital is just the tip
of the iceberg in regards to the mismanagement problems associated
with this agency.
Social Security Administration
What about the Social Security Administration,
can they be a model?
Not
according to experts.
They predict that this
agency will be bankrupt in the not too distant future.
.
Department of Transportation
With the financial troubles of Amtrak and the fact that 162,000 of
our bridges are categorized as either
structurally deficient
or
functionally obsolete, you could never use the
Department of Transportation as a model.
Department of Commerce
What about the
Department of Commerce?
How could you consider them - considering the fact that during the
past 30 years, millions of American jobs have been shipped
overseas, our economy is in shambles, Fair trade is still a dream
and not a reality, Manufacturing Plants are closing and an
estimated 300 banks will be out of business within the next 12
months.
HUD & Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac
You can’t look to
HUD,
Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac,
they’re the one responsible for
sub-prime
lending fiasco which created our current mortgage crisis.
Because of their lending practices, millions of Americans
are facing massive foreclosure.
Department of Defense
You would also have to exclude the
Department of Defense,
the agency that is riddled with cost over-runs and a
reputation of fraudulent contract awards, as was in the case of
the recent award involving the Airforce’s refueling tanker
contract .
Federal Prisons
Our Federal Prison system haven’t completely resolved their
problems.
They’re still over-crowed and
under-staffed.
Because of these and other
problems the government has decided to let private corporations
run them.
And these corporations have turned
prison industry into a profit making-business.
Department of Labor
And what about the
Department of Labor? How
could they be a model - with the unresolved problems of illegal
aliens taking American jobs, labor costs skyrocketing out of
control and record unemployment at nearly 10%.
Department of Education
And while you are eliminating these agencies, don’t forget about
the Department of Education, they have been successful in teaching
our children how to put a condom on a banana, but not how to read
above a fourth grade level. We are currently falling far behind
other countries like
India
and
China
in producing engineers and scientists.
Department of Justice & The State Department
And then what about
Department of Justice and the
State
Department? Can they be models?
No.
The Department of Justice can’t successfully prosecute
terrorist who have already confessed that they have committed the
crimes and instead of prosecuting the terrorist, the Justice
Department has turned their focuse on prosecuting the CIA
officials who obtained the confessions from the terrorist.
And as far as the
State Department is concern, their
inability to stop
Iran
and North Korea
from developing nuclear weapons along with their inability to
convince any of our allies to commit their troops to help us in
the war in
Afghanistan should eliminate this
agency as well.
Department of Energy
I would suggest The Department of Energy but they haven’t
found or developed one alternative source of
energy in the past forty years, while our gas prices continue to
increase.
Homeland Security
And finally, what about the Department of Home Land Security?
If they can’t diagnose and solve the problems associated
with our borders and illegal immigration, they certainly could not
be a model for diagnosing and solving our health care crisis.
In Summary:
Congress
- You have turned a part time
job into life long careers even though the Constitution asked that
you assemble at least once a year.
- You have moved from being paid a
per diem of $6.00 per day to annual salary of
$174,000 a year in addition to hundreds of millions dollars for
staff and benefits.
- You established a Constitutional
Amendment to give all citizens Freedom of Speech, but decided to
take away that freedom for the clergy with your so-called
Hate-Speech legislation.
- You gave our CIA permission to stop
terrorism, and now you want to investigate and prosecute them for
doing their job.
- You claim that you
care about the working class poor and now you want to tax them
2.5% if they can’t afford to buy your so-called affordable Health
Care Insurance.
- You
established the United States
Post Service in 1775 and overseen this government agency for the
past 234 years, but they have yet to make a profit or break even.
-
You established the Social
Security Administration in 1935 and have overseen this agency for
the past 74 years and now it is on the verge of bankruptcy.
-
You
established Fannie Mae
in 1938 and have had 71 years to make it work and now they are
foreclosing on millions of homes.
-
You established Freddie Mac
in 1970 and have had 39 years to make it work and today it is
nearly broke.
-
You established the
War on
Poverty in 1964 and have had 45 years to make it work and yet
poverty has increased not decreased with an unemployment rate of
almost 10%.
-
You established
Medicare
in 1965 and have had 44 years to make it work and now they have
36 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities.
- You started Medicaid, in 1970
and during the past 39 years you haven’t figured out a way to sign
up the 8,000,000 poor people who qualify for it.
-
You established the
Department of Transportation in 1966 and after 43 years, we
have over 160,000 bridges that are functionally unsafe and an
AMTRAK system that is nearly bankrupted
-
In 2008 you approved a
$700
billion bailout for several companies,
but we can’t point to one job that it has actually created.
-
You budgeted several billions
dollars for your Cash for Clunkers program in 2009 and it
ran out of funds after 30 days and 80% of the money was used to
purchase foreign cars, not American made cars.
And now with a track record like this, you want us to think that
you can manage a trillion dollar
Health Care Program?
Members of Congress, if we, the citizens of the
United States allow you to start
and run another government program after mismanaging every program
that you have started in the past 80 years, we should replace the
Stars Spangled Banner with lyrics of Sammy Davis Jr.’s famous song
and sing: “Then I’ll know - What Kind of Fool I Am?
Sincerely,
Rev. Wayne Perryman
cc. CBS News
NBC News
CNN News
FOX News
MSNBC
ABC News
Return to Index |
|
|
| Mr. Preseident:
Where is Your Resume? |
|
|
When it comes to providing quality goods and
services for the general population - there are few government
agencies that can compete with the efficiency of Private Industry.
And yet our Federal Government wants to tell
Our
Financial Institutions
how to effectively run their banks
They want to tell our Car
Manufacturers how to produce better cars
And they want to tell our
Health
Experts how to provide better
Health Care
Services for their patients.
And they are doing this at a time when we are
hard pressed to fine one government agency
that has a stellar reputation of operating effectively and
efficiently.
Some of you are worried about the
cost of Health Care.
But as a
former Human Resource Director for major corporations, I’m not
just concerned about the cost, but the
competency of the government to
implement such a massive undertaking.
If I had
the opportunity to talk to the President I would say:
Mr. President, if the Government wants the job
of taking over Health Care, we want you to provide us with Resume
of successfully run government agencies
to prove that the government is capable of running a comprehensive
health care program.
Post Office
Mr. President, as you contemplate and prepare
your Resume of successfully run
government agencies, I would advise that you not include the
United States
Post Office.
Recent reports indicate that this government agency will
lose from $6 to $12 billion dollars this year as they continue
to borrow money from the Federal Financing Bank just to stay in
business.
And in addition to consistent
record losses in revenue, this government agency has earned a
stellar reputation, not in workplace efficiency but in workplace
homicides.
Medicare & Medicaid
Mr. President, in putting together t he
government’s impressive Resume of accomplishments, I would
recommend that you exclude both
Medicare and
Medicaid. In addition to
a multitude of complaints regarding processing claims and the
poor quality of services, millions of persons who may qualify
for Medicaid have no idea how to access these
benefits.
And while Medicare faces the some
of the same types of problems - this agency is in
deep financial trouble with an estimated
$36 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities,
and no one has faintest idea where the government is going to
get the $36 trillion dollars to cover these costs.
Veteran Administration
In addition to excluding
Medicare
and
Medicaid, I don’t think you should
include the Veteran Administration
as part of
the government’s Resume.
This government
agency has a reputation of denying many of our veteran benefits
and giving substandard care to others
who are
patients in their hospitals.
Some
veterans have had to hire attorneys and had to wait several
years just to get the benefits that they earned when they served
our country.
Social Security Administration
Mr. President the
Veterans
Administration is not the only government agency that
make well-deserving ci tizens wait for
benefits. I would recommend that you not list the
Social Security Administration as an effectively run
government agency. Like the
Veteran Administration they too deny thousands of
citizens benefits - especially those
who have
applied for Social Security disability.
Many are
forced to seek legal counsel just to obtain the benefits that
they are entitled to.
As you know Mr.
President this government agency has a multitude of problems. It
is estimated that in the not too distant future this agency will
run out of funds.
Perhaps it’s because of
how they manage their money.
Mr. President,
during the past 60 days, as part of your Stimulus Plan, the
Social Security Administration sent more than 10,000 checks to
persons who had been dead for sometime.
No
one can figure out how these dead persons could help create the
1.5 million jobs that you promised to produce through your
Stimulus Plan.
Department of Transportation
Mr. President in looking for a successfully
run government agency to put on your Resume, I would recommend
that you not include the Department of
Transportation.
When reviewing
their track record, you will find that of
600,905
bridges across this country 72,868 were
categorized as structurally deficient
and an additional 89,024 of them were
categorized as functionally obsolete.
So if government plan to run our
health
care system like the
Department of
Transportation cares for our bridges, there is a good
chance that our health care system would
suffer
the same fate as the I35W bridge in Minnesota.
Mr. President you should also be aware of the fact that
reports indicate that of the least safest
bridges in America, most are found in your own back yard.
63% of Washington D.C.’s 245 bridges are
rated as either structurally deficient
or functionally obsolete.
HUD & Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac
Mr. President, if I were you, I would not
include HUD,
Fannie Mae,
or Freddie Mac in your Resume.
Every report indicates that these agencies were the ones
who were behind the sub-prime lending
fiasco that created our current mortgage crisis .
Because of their funding practices,
millions of Americans are facing foreclosure.
I don’t think these agencies would look good on our
Resume.
Department of Defense
What ever you do Mr. President, please don’t
include the Department of Defense.
This agency is known for their cost over-runs and for
fraud in contract awards.
With our current
concerns surrounding the cost of healthy care, the last
thing20we need is the duplication of a government agency that do
not know how to control costs.
Federal Prisons
Mr. President, I would also advise that you
do not include the Federal Prison system
as one of the government’s successfully run agencies.
As you know, recent reports reveal that many of these
prisons are over-crowed and under-staffed.
Because of these and other problems the government has decided
to turn over the operation of many of our prisons to private
corporations.
And these corporations have
turned prison industry into a profit making-business.
Department of Labor
And if you were thinking about using the
Department of Labor on your Resume, I
would advise you to think again. This government agency has been
so closely tied to unions, that non-union employees have had a
very difficult time getting this government agency to advocate
on their behalf.
In addition to these
problems minorities and women who work for federal contractors,
have complained that this agency is reluctant to process their
complaints of discrimination.
Department of Education
Speaking of Labor and the job market, many of
our students are falling far behind other countries like India
and China in producing engineers and scientist, so I would not
recommend putting the Department of Education
on your Resume.
The last thing we need is a
Health Care agency that’s runs like our Department of Education.
Department of Justice & The State
Department
And Mr. President if you are thinking about
putting the Department of Justice and the
State Department on your Resume, I think you
should reconsider. The
Department of Justice is not a model of success.
Th ey can’t prosecute terrorist who have already
confessed that they are guilty of the crimes.
In the health care profession that would be like doctors
not being able to follow through and treat a patient after they
have determined what was wrong with them.
And as far as the
State Department is
concern, since you have taken office Mr. President, few
countries have agreed to take any of our Gitmo prisoners nor
have they committed to sending their troops to help us in the
war in Afghanistan.
And if your health care
plan deteriorates as fast as your relationship has with
Iran and
North Korea, your
health care plan don’t stand a chance of succeeding.
Homeland
Security
And finally, Mr. President, I recommend -
that in putting together your Resume of well-run government
agencies, that you not include the
Department of
Home Land Security.
If they can’t diagnose and solve the problems associated
with our borders and illegal immigration, they certainly could
not be a model of how the doctors in your health plan would
diagnose and solve the medical problems of their patients.
In Summary, Mr. President, if you can’t
effectively manage the government agencies that you are
currently responsible for, how do you expect us to believe that
you can handle an additional trillion dollar
Health
Care Program?
Besides, many of us are wondering how a
cigarette sucking,
tobacco
addicted President, who cannot deal with his own health
care issues – can help us deal with ours.
Return to Index |
|
|
| Obama
Deceived his Supporters - He
Has no Respect Overseas |
|
|
Many people voted for Obama because he condemned
George Bush's foreign policy, stating that because of George W.
Bush's foreign policy, America is not respected around the
world, and he vowed that he would change this when he become
President. He indicated that he would sit down with Iran and North
Korea and engage in talks. He indicated that he would get other
nations involved in Afghanistan. When he spoke these words, crowds
in America cheered as well as those overseas. No one is cheering
now. Why? Since he has taken over as President
1. Not one country has stepped up to send more of their troops in
Afghanistan
2. Not one country has agreed to take prisoners in Gitmo, so he
like George W. Bush is keeping the prison for the same reason that
George W. Bush kept it open - until he determine where to put the
prisoners and what type of trial they should have.
3. Iran has tested missiles and has vowed to continue to develop
their nuclear capabilities
4. North Korea has tested missiles and today tested an atomic bomb
more powerful than the one released on Japan. Then vowed to
continue their nuclear development.
5. Israel said they will not sit back and let Iran develop their
nuclear program
5. Russia and China continue to give these countries technology to
advance their cause.
What is Obama doing? The same thing that George W. Bush did. H e
now realize that these countries have their own agenda and the
radical Muslim countries are motivated by the Koran, not by his
speeches. Not being a man of faith, Obama discounted the power of
Koran and those who believe in the Koran. Christians may discount
the Bible, but Muslims (as a whole) do not discount the Koran which
tells them to take not Christians and Jews to be their
friends (Sura 5;51). Unlike many of the Obama and Al
Sharpton type of Christians, Muslims still do not accept
homosexual lifestyles, nor do they subscribe to the concept of
separation of church and state.
Meanwhile Obama is still cutting funding for Historical Black
Colleges and denying black farmers the money due to them from a
discrimination suit that took place during the Clinton
Administration.
Rev. Wayne Perryman
Return to Index |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the Webmaster, Andy Stevens:
I had the pleasure of meeting Wayne at the Proud American event in
Bellevue earlier this month.
Rev. Wayne Perryman writes:
It was great
meeting and talking with you during the Proud To Be An American
event on Saturday. Let me say up
front. As an African American and an
inner-city minister in the City of
Seattle, I will not vote for Barack Obama.
Not only do I feel that he is unqualified for the job, I
disagree with his racist statements about whites and his position
on Abortions, same sex marriage, the war and homosexuality.
I am a former radio talk show host and have appeared as a
Conservative guest on a number of shows including C-Span book, and
Fox’s Hannity & Colmes,
I.. |
|
|
|
The three books listed below=2 0are
all research books and some have the endorsements of the top
history scholars in the country. I will start
with my most recent book.
-
The
Drama of Obama (2008):
This book proves that Obama was wrong when he referred to
our nation as a racist country in his March 18, 2008 speech, and
when he stated that
America endorsed slavery.
The facts in this book shows the contrary - it wasn’t our
nation that endorsed slavery, it was a group known as the
Democratic Party. The records will show that
our founding fathers fought slavery from the first day the slaves
arrived in America and passed legislation to free all slaves in
1711 65 years before the Declaration of Independence was signed.
The book documents that it was the founding fathers of the
Democratic Party that supported slavery and the book traces their
racist practices from 1619 to202008. It also
highlights the Republican’s impressive track records in the area
of Civil Rights and let’s Obama know, that it is his own party
that established slavery and racism in
America, not the Republicans,
-
Unveiling The Whole Truth What The Media Failed to Tell The
American Voters. (2007)
This book challenges the liberal press on a variety of
issues including:
-
Weapons of Mass Destruction
-
Bringing Our Troops Home
-
Going to Wa r over Oil
-
Abortions
-
Homo-Phobia
-
Lies About Katrina
-
Lies About the Separation of Church
& State
-
Proving that Bush has done more for
the poor and blacks than
Clinton
-
And much much more
-
Unfound
Loyalty: An In-depth Look Into the Love Affair Between Blacks &
Democrats (2004).
This book gives the history of both parties and explains when
blacks switched from Republicans to Democrats and the negative
impact that that change has had on blacks.
This book is endorsed by Professor James McPherson, History of
Princeton University.
|
|
| |
|
|
| This page last updated on
Wednesday, April 28, 2010 01:08:50 PM
|
|
New Book Review
