I confess. Senator Obama's two tax promises: to limit tax increases
to only those making over $250,000 a year, and to not raise taxes on
95% of "working Americans," intrigued me. As a hard-working small
business owner, over the past ten years I've earned from $50,000 to
$100,000 per year. If Senator Obama is shooting straight with us,
under his presidency I could look forward to paying no additional
Federal taxes -- I might even get a break -- and as I struggle to
support a family and pay for two boys in college, a reliable tax
freeze is nearly as welcome as further tax cuts.
However, Senator Obama's dual claims
seemed implausible, especially when it came to my Federal income
taxes. Those implausible promises made me look at what I'd been
paying before President Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, as well as
what I paid after those tax cuts became law. I chose the 2000 tax
tables as my baseline -- they reflect the tax rates that Senator
Obama will restore by letting the "Bush Tax Cuts" lapse. I wanted
to see what that meant from my tax bill.
I've worked as the state level media
and strategy director on three Presidential election campaigns --
I know how "promises" work -- so I analyzed Senator Obama's
promises by looking for loopholes.
The first loophole was easy to find:
Senator Obama doesn't "count" allowing the Bush tax cuts to lapse
as a tax increase. Unless the cuts are re-enacted, rates will
automatically return to the 2000 level. Senator Obama claims that
letting a tax cut lapse -- allowing the rates to return to a
higher levels -- is not actually a "tax increase." It's just the
lapsing of a tax cut.
See the difference?
Neither do I.
When those cuts lapse, my taxes are
going up -- a lot -- but by parsing words, Senator Obama
justifies his claim that he won't actively raise taxes on 95
percent of working Americans, even while he's passively allowing
tax rates to go up for 100% of Americans who actually pay
Federal income taxes.
Making this personal, my Federal
Income Tax will increase by $3,824 when those tax cuts lapse.
That not-insignificant sum would cover a couple of house
payments or help my two boys through another month or two of
college.
No matter what Senator Obama calls
it, requiring us to pay more taxes amounts to a tax increase.
This got me wondering what other Americans will have to pay when
the tax cuts lapse.
For a married family, filing jointly
and earning $75,000 a year, this increase will be $3,074. For
those making just $50,000, this increase will be $1,512.
Despite Senator Obama's claim, even struggling American families
making just $25,000 a year will see a tax increase -- they'll
pay $715 more in 2010 than they did in 2007. Across the board,
when the tax cuts lapse, working Americans will see significant
increases in their taxes, even if their household income is as
low as $25,000. See the tables at the end of this article.
Check this for yourself. Go to
http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/
and pull up the 1040 instructions for 2000 and 2007 and go to
the tax tables. Based on your 2007 income, check your taxes
rates for 2000 and 2007, and apply them to your taxable income
for 2007. In 2000 -- Senator Obama's benchmark year -- you
would have paid significantly more taxes for the income you
earned in 2007. The Bush Tax Cuts, which Senator Obama has said
he will allow to lapse, saved you money, and without those cuts,
your taxes will go back up to the 2000 level. Senator Obama
doesn't call it a "tax increase," but your taxes under
"President" Obama will increase -- significantly.
Senator Obama is willfully
deceiving you and me when he says that no one making under
$250,000 will see an increase in their taxes. If I were
keeping score, I'd call that Tax Lie #1.
The next loophole involves the
payroll tax that you pay to support the Social Security
system. Currently, there is an inflation-adjusted cap, and
according to the non-profit Tax Foundation, in 2006 -- the
most recent year for which tax data is available -- only the
first $94,700 of an unmarried individual's earnings were
subject to the 12.4 percent payroll tax. However, Senator
Obama has proposed lifting that cap, adding an additional 12.4
percent tax on every dollar earned above that cap -- and in
spite of his promise, impacting all those who earn between
$94,700 and $249,999.
By doing this, he plans to raise
an additional $1 trillion dollars (another $662.50 out of my
pocket -- and how much out of yours?) to help fund Social
Security. Half of this tax would be paid by employees and
half by employers -- but employers will either cut the payroll
or pass along this tax to their customers through higher
prices. Either way, some individual will pay the price for
the employer's share of the tax increase.
However, when challenged to
explain how he could eliminate the cap AND not raise taxes on
Americans earning under $250,000, Senator Obama
suggested on his website
that he "might" create a "donut" -- an exemption from this
payroll tax for wages between $94,700 and $250,000. But that
donut would mean he couldn't raise anywhere near that $1
trillion dollars for Social Security. When this was pointed
out, Senator Obama's "donut plan" was quietly removed from his
website.
This "explanation" sounds like
another one of those loopholes. If I were keeping score,
I'd call this Tax Lie #2.
(updated) Senator Obama has also
said that he will raise capital gains taxes from 15 percent to
20 percent. He says he's aiming at "fat cats" who make above
$250,000. However, while only 1 percent of Americans make a
quarter-million dollars, roughly 50 percent of all Americans
own stock – and while investments that are through IRAs, 401Ks
and in pension plans are not subject to capital gains, those
stocks in personal portfolios are subject to capital gains, no
matter what the owner’s income is. However, according to the
US Congress’s Joint Economic Committee Study, “Recent data
released by the Federal Reserve shows that nearly half of all
U.S. households are stockholders. In the last decade alone,
the number of stockholders has jumped by over fifty percent.”
This is clear – a significant number of all Americans who earn
well under $250,000 a year will feel this rise in their
capital gains taxes.
Under "President" Obama, if you sell off stock and earn a
$100,000 gain -- perhaps to help put your children through
college -- instead of paying $15,000 in capital gains taxes
today, you'll pay $20,000 under Obama's plan. That's a full
one-third more, and it applies no matter how much you earn.
No question -- for about 50 percent
of all Americans, this is Tax Lie #3.
Finally, Senator Obama has promised to
raise taxes on businesses -- and to raise taxes a lot on oil
companies. I still remember Econ-101 -- and I own a small
business. From both theory and practice, I know what businesses
do when taxes are raised. Corporations don't "pay" taxes -- they
collect taxes from customers and pass them along to the
government. When you buy a hot dog from a 7/11, you can see the
clerk add the sales tax, but when a corporation's own taxes go up,
you don't see it -- its automatic -- but they do the same thing.
They build this tax into their product's price. Senator Obama
knows this. He knows that even people who earn less than $250,000
will pay higher prices -- those pass-through taxes -- when
corporate taxes go up.
There's not a politician alive who
hasn't be caught telling some minor truth-bender. However, when
it comes to raising taxes, there are no small lies. When George
H.W. Bush's "Read my lips -- no new taxes" proved false, he lost
the support of his base -- and ultimately lost his re-election
bid.
This year, however, we don't have to
wait for the proof: Senator Obama has already promised to raise
taxes, and we can believe him. However, while making that promise,
he's also lied, in at least four significant ways, about who will
pay those taxes. If Senator Obama becomes President Obama, when
the tax man comes calling, we will all pay the price. And that's
the truth.
Tax Rates - and the Obama
Increase - $75,000/year Taxable
Income
|
2000 Tax Tables
|
2003 Tax Tables
|
2004 Tax Tables
|
2010 Tax Tables - (Bush
Tax Cuts have Expired)
|
Increase with Obama Tax
Increase*
|
|
Taxable Income
|
$75,000
|
$75,000
|
$75,000
|
$75,000
|
$75,000
|
|
Tax: Single
|
$17,923
|
$15,739
|
$15,620
|
$17,923
|
$2,303
|
|
Tax: Married - Filing
Joint
|
$15,293
|
$12,364
|
$12,219
|
$15,293
|
$3,074
|
|
Tax: Married - Filing
Separate
|
$18,803
|
$16,083
|
$15,972
|
$18,803
|
$2,831
|
|
Tax: Head of Household
|
$16,424
|
$14,439
|
$14,344
|
$16,424
|
$2,080
|
Tax Rates - and the Obama
Increase - $100,000/year Taxable
Income
|
2000 Tax Tables
|
2003 Tax Tables
|
2004 Tax Tables
|
2010 Tax Tables - (Bush
Tax Cuts have Expired)
|
Increase with Obama Tax
Increase*
|
|
Taxable Income
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
|
Tax: Single
|
$25,673
|
$22,739
|
$22,620
|
$25,673
|
|
|
Tax: Married - Filing
Joint
|
$22,293
|
$18,614
|
$18,469
|
$22,293
|
$3,824
|
|
Tax: Married - Filing
Separate
|
$27,515
|
$23,715
|
$23,504
|
$27,515
|
$4,011
|
|
Tax: Head of Household
|
$23,699
|
$20,741
|
$20,594
|
$23,699
|
$3,015
|
* When "President" Obama
allows President Bush's tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 to
expire, this will amount to a de facto tax increase -
|
|