|
E-Mail
| |
|
|
|
GLOBAL AIR-CON
A description of Global Warming in laymans language |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Climatologist Brian Sussman does not buy into Global Warming,
He has studied the Global Warming phenomenon for a long
time and in fact calls it the biggest Scam and
Hoax ever perpetrated on the world population.
To make the point he uses a comparison to the football
field made by another unbeliever writer. A football field is 100
yards long. Imagine that the football field represents the Earths
atmosphere........got it.
From the Goal line at one end to the 78 yard line near
the other end represents Nitrogen.
From the 78 yard line to the 99 yard line (21 yards)
represents Oxygen.
From the 99 yard line to the 3 inch line represents
Argon.
From the 3 inch line to the 1 inch line represents
various other gases of the atmosphere.
The last inch represents CO2.
95% of that last inch comes from water vapor.
(evaporation off of oceans,lakes rivers etc.)
2.67% of that last inch comes from other natural
causes........volcanoes, breathing animals, etc.
2.33% of that last inch comes from man. This final
2.33% of the last inch would be represented by a line that is .0233
inches narrow. For those ofyou who are not scientific, that's about
8 brown human hairs laid side by side.
(Black are thicker, blond are thinner) For those of
you that are scientific, it is the width of the common leader or
dimension lines on scientific drawings (the thinnest lines on the
drawing sheet)
That .023 hundredths of an inch includes humans
exhaling out CO2. (maybe we could ask Algore to stop as he seems
to use so much of it) The real climatologists (those who are
retired or don't require government funding) are all over this
Scam.
Seriously, picture that last portion of the football
field (representing the atmosphere) and please explain how reducing
the line from .023 to .017 is going to do anything. Are we to
believe that man can eliminate 25% of his portion (or 1.5 human
hairs) of CO2 and have a significant effect on the atmosphere. Its
Bullpucky!
Does anyone else out there wonder about Algore's Hoax
and Scam to make himself rich. When you listen to Algore, notice
that he has charts going back 1,000 years. Impressive?? Did you
wonder why he does not go back farther.
Here is why, in 873 AD the earth had a Global Warming
cycle, much warmer than the current one, there are historical
records showing how the world population had a better life during
that period of warming, they had better crops, more food to go
around because of that couple of degrees.
There was "0" use of burning hydrocarbons back then.
(The current Algore theoretical source of the problem) What made it
so hot? Good Question! The Earth goes thru cycles, and so does the
Sun. Every 1500 years there is an unstoppable Global Warming cycle
that has "Nothing" to do with CO2. Records of this fact have been
pulled from Ice samples.
|
|
Global Warming and the Price
of a Gallon of Gas
by John Coleman |
|
John Coleman's Comments Before the San Diego Chamber of Commerce
You may want to give credit where credit is due to Al Gore and his
global warming campaign the next time you fill your car with
gasoline, because there is a direct connection between Global
Warming and four dollar a gallon gas. It is shocking, but true, to
learn that the entire Global Warming frenzy is based on the
environmentalist’s attack on fossil fuels, particularly gasoline.
All this big time science, international meetings, thick research
papers, dire threats for the future; all of it, comes down to their
claim that the carbon dioxide in the exhaust from your car and in
the smoke stacks from our power plants is destroying the climate of
planet Earth. What an amazing fraud; what a scam.
The future of our civilization lies in the balance.
That’s the battle cry of the High Priest of Global Warming Al Gore
and his fellow, agenda driven disciples as they predict a calamitous
outcome from anthropogenic global warming. According to Mr. Gore the
polar ice caps will collapse and melt and sea levels will rise 20
feet inundating the coastal cities making 100 million of us
refugees. Vice President Gore tells us numerous Pacific islands will
be totally submerged and uninhabitable. He tells us global warming
will disrupt the circulation of the ocean waters, dramatically
changing climates, throwing the world food supply into chaos. He
tells us global warming will turn hurricanes into super storms,
produce droughts, wipe out the polar bears and result in bleaching
of coral reefs. He tells us tropical diseases will spread to mid
latitudes and heat waves will kill tens of thousands. He preaches to
us that we must change our lives and eliminate fossil fuels or face
the dire consequences. The future of our civilization is in the
balance.
With a preacher’s zeal, Mr. Gore sets out to strike terror into us
and our children and make us feel we are all complicit in the
potential demise of the planet.
Here is my rebuttal.
There is no significant man made global warming. There has not been
any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear
any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always
changed. But mankind’s activities have not overwhelmed or
significantly modified the natural forces.
Through all history, Earth has shifted between two basic climate
regimes: ice ages and what paleoclimatologists call “Interglacial
periods”. For the past 10 thousand years the Earth has been in an
interglacial period. That might well be called nature’s global
warming because what happens during an interglacial period is the
Earth warms up, the glaciers melt and life flourishes. Clearly from
our point of view, an interglacial period is greatly preferred to
the deadly rigors of an ice age. Mr. Gore and his crowd would have
us believe that the activities of man have overwhelmed nature during
this interglacial period and are producing an unprecedented, out of
control warming.
Well, it is simply not happening. Worldwide there was a significant
natural warming trend in the 1980’s and 1990’s as a Solar cycle
peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares. That ended in 1998
and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and
the global temperatures have gone into decline. Earth has cooled for
almost ten straight years. So, I ask Al Gore, where’s the global
warming?
The cooling trend is so strong that recently the head of the United
Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had to
acknowledge it. He speculated that nature has temporarily
overwhelmed mankind’s warming and it may be ten years or so before
the warming returns. Oh, really. We are supposed to be in a panic
about man-made global warming and the whole thing takes a ten year
break because of the lack of Sun spots. If this weren’t so serious,
it would be laughable.
Now allow me to talk a little about the science behind the global
warming frenzy. I have dug through thousands of pages of research
papers, including the voluminous documents published by the United
Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I have worked my
way through complicated math and complex theories. Here’s the bottom
line: the entire global warming scientific case is based on the
increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the use of fossil
fuels. They don’t have any other issue. Carbon Dioxide, that’s it.
Hello Al Gore; Hello UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Your science is flawed; your hypothesis is wrong; your data is
manipulated. And, may I add, your scare tactics are deplorable. The
Earth does not have a fever. Carbon dioxide does not cause
significant global warming.
The focus on atmospheric carbon dioxide grew out a study by Roger
Revelle who was an esteemed scientist at the Scripps Oceanographic
Institute. He took his research with him when he moved to Harvard
and allowed his students to help him process the data for his paper.
One of those students was Al Gore. That is where Gore got caught up
in this global warming frenzy. Revelle’s paper linked the increases
in carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere with warming. It labeled
CO2 as a greenhouse gas.
Charles Keeling, another researcher at the Scripps Oceanographic
Institute, set up a system to make continuous CO2 measurements. His
graph of these increases has now become known as the Keeling Curve.
When Charles Keeling died in 2005, his son David, also at Scripps,
took over the measurements. Here is what the Keeling curve shows: an
increase in CO2 from 315 parts per million in 1958 to 385 parts per
million today, an increase of 70 parts per million or about 20
percent.
All the computer models, all of the other findings, all of the other
angles of study, all come back to and are based on CO2 as a
significant greenhouse gas. It is not.
Here is the deal about CO2, carbon dioxide. It is a natural
component of our atmosphere. It has been there since time began. It
is absorbed and emitted by the oceans. It is used by every living
plant to trigger photosynthesis. Nothing would be green without it.
And we humans; we create it. Every time we breathe out, we emit
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It is not a pollutant. It is not
smog. It is a naturally occurring invisible gas.
Let me illustrate. I estimate that this square in front of my face
contains 100,000 molecules of atmosphere. Of those 100,000 only 38
are CO2; 38 out of a hundred thousand. That makes it a trace
component. Let me ask a key question: how can this tiny trace upset
the entire balance of the climate of Earth? It can’t. That’s all
there is to it; it can’t.
The UN IPCC has attracted billions of dollars for the research to
try to make the case that CO2 is the culprit of run-away, man-made
global warming. The scientists have come up with very complex
creative theories and done elaborate calculations and run computer
models they say prove those theories. They present us with a concept
they call radiative forcing. The research organizations and
scientists who are making a career out of this theory, keep cranking
out the research papers. Then the IPCC puts on big conferences at
exotic places, such as the recent conference in Bali. The scientists
endorse each other’s papers, they are summarized and voted on, and
viola, we are told global warming is going to kill us all unless we
stop burning fossil fuels.
May I stop here for a few historical notes? First, the internal
combustion engine and gasoline were awful polluters when they were
first invented. And, both gasoline and automobile engines continued
to leave a layer of smog behind right up through the 1960’s. Then
science and engineering came to the environmental rescue. Better
exhaust and ignition systems, catalytic converters, fuel injectors,
better engineering throughout the engine and reformulated gasoline
have all contributed to a huge reduction in the exhaust emissions
from today’s cars. Their goal then was to only exhaust carbon
dioxide and water vapor, two gases widely accepted as natural and
totally harmless. Anyone old enough to remember the pall of smog
that used to hang over all our cities knows how much improvement
there has been. So the environmentalists, in their battle against
fossil fuels and automobiles had a very good point forty years ago,
but now they have to focus almost entirely on the once harmless
carbon dioxide. And, that is the rub. Carbon dioxide is not an
environmental problem; they just want you now to think it is.
Numerous independent research projects have been done about the
greenhouse impact from increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide.
These studies have proven to my total satisfaction that CO2 is not
creating a major greenhouse effect and is not causing an increase in
temperatures. By the way, before his death, Roger Revelle coauthored
a paper cautioning that CO2 and its greenhouse effect did not
warrant extreme countermeasures.
So now it has come down to an intense campaign, orchestrated by
environmentalists claiming that the burning of fossil fuels dooms
the planet to run-away global warming. Ladies and Gentlemen, that is
a myth.
So how has the entire global warming frenzy with all its predictions
of dire consequences, become so widely believed, accepted and
regarded as a real threat to planet Earth? That is the most amazing
part of the story.
To start with global warming has the backing of the United Nations,
a major world force. Second, it has the backing of a former Vice
President and very popular political figure. Third it has the
endorsement of Hollywood, and that’s enough for millions. And,
fourth, the environmentalists love global warming. It is their tool
to combat fossil fuels. So with the environmentalists, the UN, Gore
and Hollywood touting Global Warming and predictions of doom and
gloom, the media has scrambled with excitement to climb aboard.
After all the media loves a crisis. From YK2 to killer bees the
media just loves to tell us our lives are threatened. And the media
is biased toward liberal, so it’s pre-programmed to support Al Gore
and UN. CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The LA Times,
The Washington Post, the Associated Press and here in San Diego The
Union Tribune are all constantly promoting the global warming
crisis.
So who is going to go against all of that power? Not the
politicians. So now the President of the United States, just about
every Governor, most Senators and most Congress people, both of the
major current candidates for President, most other elected officials
on all levels of government are all riding the Al Gore Global
Warming express. That is one crowded bus.
I suspect you haven’t heard it because the mass media did not report
it, but I am not alone on the no man-made warming side of this
issue. On May 20th, a list of the names of over thirty-one thousand
scientists who refute global warming was released. Thirty-one
thousand of which 9,000 are Ph.ds. Think about that. Thirty-one
thousand. That dwarfs the supposed 2,500 scientists on the UN panel.
In the past year, five hundred of scientists have issued public
statements challenging global warming. A few more join the chorus
every week. There are about 100 defectors from the UN IPCC. There
was an International Conference of Climate Change Skeptics in New
York in March of this year. One hundred of us gave presentations.
Attendance was limited to six hundred people. Every seat was taken.
There are a half dozen excellent internet sites that debunk global
warming. And, thank goodness for KUSI and Michael McKinnon, its
owner. He allows me to post my comments on global warming on the
website KUSI.com. Following the publicity of my position form Fox
News, Glen Beck on CNN, Rush Limbaugh and a host of other
interviews, thousands of people come to the website and read my
comments. I get hundreds of supportive emails from them. No I am not
alone and the debate is not over.
In my remarks in New York I speculated that perhaps we should sue Al
Gore for fraud because of his carbon credits trading scheme. That
remark has caused a stir in the fringe media and on the internet.
The concept is that if the media won’t give us a hearing and the
other side will not debate us, perhaps we could use a Court of law
to present our papers and our research and if the Judge is unbiased
and understands science, we win. The media couldn’t ignore that.
That idea has become the basis for legal research by notable
attorneys and discussion among global warming debunkers, but it’s a
long way from the Court room.
I am very serious about this issue. I think stamping out the global
warming scam is vital to saving our wonderful way of life.
The battle against fossil fuels has controlled policy in this
country for decades. It was the environmentalist’s prime force in
blocking any drilling for oil in this country and the blocking the
building of any new refineries, as well. So now the shortage they
created has sent gasoline prices soaring. And, it has lead to the
folly of ethanol, which is also partly behind the fuel price
increases; that and our restricted oil policy. The ethanol folly is
also creating a food crisis throughput the world – it is behind the
food price rises for all the grains, for cereals, bread, everything
that relies on corn or soy or wheat, including animals that are fed
corn, most processed foods that use corn oil or soybean oil or corn
syrup. Food shortages or high costs have led to food riots in some
third world countries and made the cost of eating out or at home
budget busting for many.
So now the global warming myth actually has lead to the chaos we are
now enduring with energy and food prices. We pay for it every time
we fill our gas tanks. Not only is it running up gasoline prices, it
has changed government policy impacting our taxes, our utility bills
and the entire focus of government funding. And, now the Congress is
considering a cap and trade carbon credits policy. We the citizens
will pay for that, too. It all ends up in our taxes and the price of
goods and services.
So the Global warming frenzy is, indeed, threatening our
civilization. Not because global warming is real; it is not. But
because of the all the horrible side effects of the global warming
scam.
I love this civilization. I want to do my part to protect it.
If Al Gore and his global warming scare dictates the future policy
of our governments, the current economic downturn could indeed
become a recession, drift into a depression and our modern
civilization could fall into an abyss. And it would largely be a
direct result of the global warming frenzy.
My mission, in what is left of a long and exciting lifetime, is to
stamp out this Global Warming silliness and let all of us get on
with enjoying our lives and loving our planet, Earth.
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/13681217.html
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/19842304.html
|
|
|
|
|
| This page last updated on
Thursday, October 30, 2008 10:37:25 AM
|
|
