|





E-Mail

| |
|

|
|
The Supreme Court concurs with our
Founding Fathers
Thank you President Bush
for having the foresight and the intestinal fortitude to select and
appoint Supreme Court Justices who will interpret the Constitution
rather than legislate from the bench. Hold that thought precious and
imagine justices who would be appointed by NoBama, the Democrats and the
Liberal Left.
Support our Troops and all they've accomplished and support our
freedom's and our Constitution by doing all you can to actively support
the Republican candidates in your local and state government.
|
|
Support
John McCain for President. |
|

|
|
|
|
Founding
Fathers on the Second Amendment
- GEORGE WASHINGTON (First President)
- "Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself.
They are the people's liberty teeth keystone... the rifle and the
pistol are equally indispensable... more than 99% of them by their
silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference. When
firearms go, all goes, we need them every hour." (Address to 1st
session of Congress)
- THOMAS JEFFERSON (Author of Declaration of Independence,
member Continental Congress, Governor of Virginia, Minister to France,
Secretary of State, Vice President, 3rd President )
- "On every question of construction (of the Constitution) let us
carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted,
recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of
trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented
against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." 12
Jun 1823 (The Complete Jefferson p.32)
- "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (Jefferson
Papers, p. 334, C.J. Boyd, 1950)
- "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep
and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against
tyranny in government." (Thomas Jefferson Papers p. 334,
1950)
- "And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are
not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit
of resistance? Let them take arms...The tree of liberty must be
refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and
tyrants." Letter to William S. Smith 13 Nov 1787 (Jefferson, On
Democracy p. 20, 1939; Padover, editor)
- "The few cases wherein these things (proposed Bill of Rights)
may do evil, cannot be weighed against the multitude where the want
of them will do evil...I hope therefore a bill of rights will be
formed to guard the people against the federal government..."
(letter to Madison 31 July 1788, The Papers of James Madison,
Hobson & Rutland, p.11:212)
- "I have a right to nothing which another has a right to take
away." (letter to Uriah Forrest, 1787, Jefferson Papers, 12:477)
- "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will
within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do
not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the
tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the
individual." (letter to Isaac Tifany, 1819)
- GEORGE MASON (Virginia House of Burgesses, Virginia
delegate to Constitutional Convention, wrote Virginia Declaration of
Rights, wrote "Objections to the Constitution", urged creation of a
Bill of Rights)
- "I ask, Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole
people, except a few public officers." (Jonathan Elliot, The
Debates of the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the
Federal Constitution, [NY: Burt Franklin,1888] p.425-6)
- "Forty years ago, when the resolution of enslaving America was
formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised...to
disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to
enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken
them, and let them sink gradually, by totally disusing and
neglecting the militia..." (In Virginia's Ratifying Convention,
Elliot p.3:379-380)
- "The militia may be here destroyed by that method which has been
practiced in other parts of the world before; that is, by rendering
them useless - by disarming them." (Elliot, p. 3:379-80)
- "I consider and fear the natural propensity of rulers to oppress
the people. I wish only to prevent them from doing evil." (In
Virginia's Ratifying Convention, Elliot p.3:381)
- JOHN ADAMS (Signed Declaration of Independence, Continental
Congress delegate, 1st Vice President, 2nd President)
- "Arms in the hands of citizens (may) be used at individual
discretion...in private self-defense..." 1788(A Defense of the
Constitution of the Government of the USA, p.471)
- JAMES MONROE (Served in Revolutionary Army, member
Continental Congress, Governor of Virginia, U.S. Secretary of State,
Secretary of War, 5th President)
- "But it ought always be held prominently in view that the safety
of these States and of everything dear to a free people must depend
in an eminent degree on the militia." (his first Inaugural Address,
1817)
- SAM ADAMS (Signed Declaration of Independence, organized
the Sons of Liberty, participated in Boston Tea Party, Member of
Continental Congress, Governor of Massachusetts)
- "And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize
Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the right of
conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are
peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; ...or to prevent
the people from petitioning , in a peaceable and orderly manner; or
to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their
persons, papers or possessions." (Debates of the Massachusetts
Convention of 1788, p86-87)
- JAMES MADISON (Drafted Virginia Constitution, Member of
Continental Congress, Virginia delegate to Constitutional Convention,
named "Father of the Constitution", author of Federalist Papers,
author of the Bill of Rights, Congressman from Virginia, Secretary of
State, 4th President)
- "Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans
possess over the people of almost every other nation.. (where) ..the
governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (Federalist
Papers #46)
- "I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of freedom
of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power
than by violent and sudden usurpations."
- "They [proposed Bill of Rights] relate 1st. to private
rights....the great object in view is to limit and qualify the
powers of government..." 8 June 1789 (The Papers of James
Madison, Hobson & Rutland, 12:193, 204)
- "To these (federal troops attempting to impose tyranny) would be
opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with
arms in their hands." (Federalist Papers #46)
- RICHARD HENRY LEE (Signed Declaration of Independence,
introduced resolution in Continental Congress to become independent,
proposed Bill of Rights from beginning, author of Anti-Fed Papers,
Congressman and Senator from Virginia)
- "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people
themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." 1788 (Federal
Farmer, p.169)
- "To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the
people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when
young, how to use them..." 1788 (Federal Farmer)
- "No free government was ever founded, or ever preserved its
liberty, without uniting the characters of the citizen and soldier
in those destined for the defense of the state... Such are a well
regulated militia, composed of the freeholders, citizens and
husbandman, who take up arms to preserve their property, as
individuals, and their rights as freemen."
- PATRICK HENRY ('Liberty or Death' Speech, member of
Continental Congress, Governor of Virginia, member Virginia convention
to ratify U.S. Constitution, urged creation of Bill of Rights for
Constitution )
- "The great object is, that every man be armed.... Every one who
is able may have a gun." (Elliot p.3:386)
- "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect
everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will
preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force,
you are inevitably ruined." During Virginia Ratification Convention
1788 (Elliot p.3:45)
- "I am not well versed in history, but I will submit to your
recollection, whether liberty has been destroyed most often by the
licentiousness of the people, or by the tyranny of rulers. I
imagine, sir, you will find the balance on the side of tyranny."
(Elliot P.3:74)
- "My great objection to this government is, that it does not
leave us the means of defending our rights, or of waging wars
against tyrants." (Elliot, 3:47-48; in Virginia Ratifying
Convention, before Bill of Rights)
- "O sir, we should have fine times, indeed, if, to punish
tyrants, it were only sufficient to assemble the people! Your arms,
wherewith you could defend yourselves, are gone..." (Elliot
p.3:50-52, in Virginia Ratifying Convention demanding a guarantee of
the right to bear arms.)
- BEN FRANKLIN (member, Continental Congress, signed
Declaration of Independence, attended Constitutional Convention, 1st
Postmaster General)
- "Those who would give up essential Liberty to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." (Respectfully
Quoted, p. 201, Suzy Platt, Barnes & Noble, 1993)
- NOAH WEBSTER (Served in Revolutionary Army, Printed
dictionary; a federalist)
- "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed;
as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in
America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole
body of the people are armed...." (An Examination of the Leading
Principles of the Federal Constitution, Webster1787)
- "A people can never be deprived of their liberties, while they
retain in their own hands, a power sufficient to any other power in
the state." (Webster, p.42-43)
- ALEXANDER HAMILTON (Member of Continental Congress,
Aid-de-camp to General Washington, commanded forces at Yorktown, New
York delegate to the Constitutional Convention, wrote Federalist
Papers, 1st Secretary of Treasury for George Washington, wanted
'President for life')
- "Little more can reasonably be aimed at with respect to the
people at large than to have them properly armed and equipped."
(Federalist Papers #29)
- TENCH COXE (friend of Madison, member of Continental
Congress)
- "Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves. Congress have no
power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible
implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American...(T)he
unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the
federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever
remain, in the hands of the people." (Freeman's Journal, 20
Feb 1778)
- "As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly
before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces
which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might
pervert their power to the injury of their fellow-citizens, the
people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and
bear their private arms." (introduction to his discussion, and
support, of the 2nd Amend) "Remarks on the First Part of the
Amendments to the Federal Constitution" Philadelphia Federal
Gazette, 18 June 1789, pg.2
- "The militia, who are in fact the effective part of the people
at large, ...will form a powerful check upon the regular troops..."
(Coxe, An Examination of the Constitution of the United States
of America p.20-21)
- REPRESENTATIVE WILLIAMSON (member of the first Congress of
the United States)
- "The burden of the militia duty lies equally upon all persons;"
in Congress, 22 Dec 1790 (Elliot, p423)
- WILLIAM GRAYSON (Senator from Virginia in first Congress
under the United States Constitution)
- "Last Monday a string of amendments were presented to the lower
house; these altogether respect personal liberty..." (in letter to
Patrick Henry)
- ZACHARIA JOHNSON (delegate to Virginia Ratifying
Convention)
- "The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are
left in full possession of them." (Elliot, 3:645-6)
|
|

|
|
What in the World is Going On? |
|

|
The
following article is an overview on the current state of world history and
how it will
impact our future. It is based on four major transformations that
are taking place throughout the world today that will shape our
future. It explains how the implication of these
transformations will impact not only our lives, but the lives of our
children our grand children and our history forever.
This information in
not of a radical nature or biased thinking. Rather it is based
on world wide statistics relative to the religion, economy,
environment and the ever expanding population explosion.
Download the printer friendly PDF version of "Whats
Going On" |

Webmaster: Andy Stevens |
|

|
|
WHAT IN THE WORLD IS GOING ON?
By HERBERT MEYER
The culture
war is the whole ballgame. If we lose it, there isn't another
America to pull us out.
|
|
|
|
• FOUR MAJOR
TRANSFORMATIONS |
|
Currently, there are four major transformations that are shaping
political, economic and world events. These transformations have
profound implications for American business leaders and owners, our
culture and on our way of life.
1.
The War in Iraq
There are
three major monotheistic religions in the world: Christianity,
Judaism and Islam.
In the 16th
century, Judaism and Christianity reconciled with the modern world.
The rabbis, priests and scholars found a way to settle up and pave
the way forward. Religion remained at the center of life, church
and state became separate. Rule of law, the idea of economic
liberty, individual rights, human rights - all these are defining
points of modern Western civilization. These concepts started with
the Greeks but didn't take off until the 15th and 16th century when
Judaism and Christianity found a way to reconcile with the modern
world. When that happened, it unleashed the scientific revolution
and the greatest outpouring of art, literature and music the world
has ever known.
Islam, which
developed in the 7th century, counts millions of Moslems around the
world who are normal people. However, there is a radical streak
within Islam. When the radicals are in charge, Islam attacks
Western civilization. Islam first attacked Western civilization in
the 7th century, and later in the 16th and 17th centuries. By 1683,
the Moslems (Turks from the Ottoman Empire) were literally at the
gates of Vienna. It was in Vienna that the climatic battle between
Islam and Western civilization took place. The West won and went
forward. Islam lost and went backward.
Interestingly, the date of that battle was September 11. Since
them, Islam has not found a way to reconcile with the modern world.
Today,
terrorism is the third attack on Western civilization by radical
Islam. To deal with terrorism, the U.S. is doing two things.
First, units of our armed forces are in 30 countries around the
world hunting down terrorist groups and dealing with them. This
gets very little publicity. Second we are taking military action in
Afghanistan and Iraq.
These
actions are covered relentlessly by the media. People can argue
about whether the war in Iraq is right or wrong. However, the
underlying strategy behind the war is to use our military to remove
the radicals from power and give the moderates a chance. Our hope
is that, over time, the moderates will find a way to bring Islam
forward into the 21st century. That's what our involvement in Iraq
and Afghanistan is all about.
The lesson
of 9/11 is that we live in a world where a small number of people
can kill a large number of people very quickly. They can use
airplanes, bombs, anthrax, chemical weapons or dirty bombs. Even
with a first-rate intelligence service (which the U.S. does not
have), you can't stop every attack. That means our tolerance for
political horseplay has dropped to zero. No longer will we play
games with terrorists or weapons of mass destructions.
Most of the
instability and horseplay is coming from the Middle East.
That's why
we have thought that if we could knock out the radicals and give the
moderates a chance to hold power; they might find a way to reconcile
Islam with the modern world. So when looking at Afghanistan or
Iraq, it's important to look for any signs that they are
modernizing.
For example:
women being brought into the work force and colleges in Afghanistan
is good. The Iraqis stumbling toward a constitution is good.
People can
argue about what the U.S. is doing and how we're doing it, but
anything that suggests Islam is finding its way forward is good.
2. The
Emergence of China
In the last
20 years, China has moved 250 million people from the farms and
villages into the cities. Their plan is to move another 300 million
in the next 20 years. When you put that many people into the
cities, you have to find work for them. That's why China is
addicted to manufacturing; they have to put all the relocated people
to work. When we decide to manufacture something in the U.S., it's
based on market needs and the opportunity to make a profit. In
China, they make the decision because they want the jobs, which is a
very different calculation.
While China
is addicted to manufacturing, Americans are addicted to low prices.
As a result, a unique kind of economic codependency has developed
between the two countries. If we ever stop buying from China, they
will explode politically. If China stops selling to us, our economy
will take a huge hit because prices will jump. We are subsidizing
their economic development; they are subsidizing our economic
growth.
Because of
their huge growth in manufacturing, China is hungry for raw
materials, which drives prices up worldwide. China is also thirsty
for oil, which is one reason oil is now at $100 a barrel. By 2020,
China will produce more cars than the U.S. China is also buying its
way into the oil infrastructure around the world. They are doing it
in the open market and paying fair market prices, but millions of
barrels of oil that would have gone to the U.S. are now going to
China. China's quest to assure it has the oil it needs to fuel its
economy is a major factor in world politics and economics.
We have our
Navy fleets protecting the sea lines, specifically the ability to
get the tankers through. It won't be long before the Chinese have
an aircraft carrier sitting in the Persian Gulf as well. The
question is, will their aircraft carrier be pointing in the same
direction as ours or against us?
3.
Shifting Demographics of Western Civilization
Most
countries in the Western world have stopped breeding. For a
civilization obsessed with sex, this is remarkable. Maintaining a
steady population requires a birth rate of 2.1. In Western Europe,
the birth rate currently stands at 1.5, or 30 percent below
replacement. In 30 years there will be 70 to 80 million fewer
Europeans than there are today. The current birth rate in Germany
is 1.3. Italy and Spain are even lower at 1.2. At that rate, the
working age population declines by 30 percent in 20 years, which has
a huge impact on the economy. When you don't have young workers to
replace the older ones, you have to import them.
The
European countries are currently importing Moslems. Today, the
Moslems comprise 10 percent of France and Germany, and the
percentage is rising rapidly because they have higher birthrates.
However, the Moslem populations are not being integrated into the
cultures of their host countries, which is a political catastrophe.
One reason Germany and France don't support the Iraq war is they
fear their Moslem populations will explode on them. By 2020, more
than half of all births in the Netherlands will be non-European.
The huge
design flaw in the postmodern secular state is that you need a
traditional religious society birth rate to sustain it. The
Europeans simply don't wish to have children, so they are dying. In
Japan, the birthrate is 1.3. As a result, Japan will lose up to 60
million people over the next 30 years. Because Japan has a very
different society than Europe, they refuse to import workers.
Instead, they are just shutting down. Japan has already closed
2,000 schools, and is closing them down at the rate of 300 per
year. Japan is also aging very rapidly. By 2020, one out of every
five Japanese will be at least 70 years old. Nobody has any idea
about how to run an economy with those demographics.
Europe
and Japan, which comprise two of the world's major economic engines,
aren't merely in recession, they're shutting down. This will have a
huge impact on the world economy, and it is already beginning to
happen. Why are the birthrates so low? There is a direct
correlation between abandonment of traditional religious society and
a drop in birth rate, and Christianity in Europe is becoming
irrelevant.
The
second reason is economic. When the birth rate drops below
replacement, the population ages. With fewer working people to
support more retired people, it puts a crushing tax burden on the
smaller group of working age people. As a result, young people
delay marriage and having a family. Once this trend starts, the
downward spiral only gets worse. These countries have abandoned all
the traditions they formerly held in regard to having families and
raising children.
The U.S.
birth rate is 2.0, just below replacement. We have an increase in
population because of immigration. When broken down by ethnicity,
the Anglo birth rate is 1.6 (same as France) while the Hispanic
birth rate is 2.7. In the U.S., the baby boomers are starting to
retire in massive numbers. This will push the elder dependency ratio
from 19 to 38 over the next 10 to 15 years. This is not as bad as
Europe, but still represents the same kind of trend.
Western
civilization seems to have forgotten what every primitive society
understands - you need kids to have a healthy society. Children are
huge consumers. Then they grow up to become taxpayers. That's how
a society works, but the postmodern secular state seems to have
forgotten that. If U.S. birth rates of the past 20 to 30 years had
been the same as post-World War II, there would be no Social
Security or Medicare problems.
The
world's most effective birth control device is money. As society
creates a middle class and women move into the workforce, birth
rates drop. Having large families is incompatible with middle class
living.
The
quickest way to drop the birth rate is through rapid economic
development. After World War II, the U.S. instituted a $600 tax
credit per child. The idea was to enable mom and dad to have four
children without being troubled by taxes. This led to a baby boom
of 22 million kids, which was a huge consumer market. That turned
into a huge tax base. However, to match that incentive in today's
dollars would cost $12,000 per child.
China and
India do not have declining populations. However, in both
countries, there is a preference for boys over girls, and we now
have the technology to know which is which before they are born. In
China and India, families are aborting the girls. As a result, in
each of these countries there are 70 million boys growing up who
will never find wives. When left alone, nature produces 103 boys
for every 100 girls. In some provinces, however, the ratio is 128
boys to every 100 girls.
The birth
rate in Russia is so low that by 2050 their population will be
smaller than that of Yemen. Russia has one-sixth of the earth's land
surface and much of its oil. You can't control that much area with
such a small population. Immediately to the south, you have China
with 70 million unmarried men who are a real potential nightmare
scenario for Russia.
4.
Restructuring of American Business
The fourth
major transformation involves a fundamental restructuring of
American business. Today's business environment is very complex and
competitive. To succeed, you have to be the best, which means
having the highest quality and lowest cost. Whatever your price
point, you must have the best quality and lowest price. To be the
best, you have to concentrate on one thing. You can't be all things
to all people and be the best.
A generation
ago, IBM used to make every part of their computer. Now Intel makes
the chips, Microsoft makes the software, and someone else makes the
modems, hard drives, monitors, etc. IBM even out-sources their call
center. Because IBM has all these companies supplying goods and
services cheaper and better than they could do it themselves, they
can make a better computer at a lower cost. This is called a
fracturing of business. When one company can make a better product
by relying on others to perform functions the business it used to do
itself, it creates a complex pyramid of companies that serve and
support each other.
This
fracturing of American business is now in its second generation.
The
companies who supply IBM are now doing the same thing - outsourcing
many of their core services and production process. As a result,
they can make cheaper, better products. Over time, this pyramid
continues to get bigger and bigger. Just when you think it can't
fracture again, it does.
Even very
small businesses can have a large pyramid of corporate entities that
perform many of its important functions. One aspect of this trend
is that companies end up with fewer employees and more independent
contractors. This trend has also created two new words in business,
integrator and complementor. At the top of the pyramid, IBM is the
integrator. As you go down the pyramid, Microsoft, Intel and the
other companies that support IBM are the complementors. However,
each of the complementors is itself an integrator for the
complementors underneath it.
This has
several implications, the first of which is that we are now getting
false readings on the economy. People who used to be employees are
now independent contractors launching their own businesses. There
are many people working whose work is not listed as a job. As a
result, the economy is perking along better than the numbers are
telling us.
Outsourcing
also confused the numbers. Suppose a company like General Motors
decides to outsource all its employee cafeteria functions to
Marriott (which it did). It lays-off hundreds of cafeteria
workers, who then get hired right back by Marriott. The only thing
that has changed is that these people work for Marriott rather than
GM. Yet, the media headlines will scream that America has lost more
manufacturing jobs.
All that
really happened is that these workers are now reclassified as
service workers. So the old way of counting jobs contributes to
false economic readings. As yet, we haven't figured out how to make
the numbers catch up with the changing realities of the business
world.
Another
implication of this massive restructuring is that because companies
are getting rid of units and people that used to work for them, the
entity is smaller. As the companies get smaller and more efficient,
revenues are going down but profits are going up. As a result, the
old notion that revenues are up and we're doing great isn't always
the case anymore. Companies are getting smaller but are becoming
more efficient and profitable in the process.
|
|
• IMPLICATIONS OF THE FOUR
TRANSFORMATIONS |
|
1. The War in Iraq
In some
ways, the war is going very well. Afghanistan and Iraq have the
beginnings of a modern government, which is a huge step forward.
The Saudis are starting to talk about some good things, while Egypt
and Lebanon are beginning to move in a good direction. A series of
revolutions have taken place in countries like Ukraine and Georgia.
There will
be more of these revolutions for an interesting reason. In every
revolution, there comes a point where the dictator turns to the
general and says, 'Fire into the crowd'. If the general fires into
the crowd, it stops the revolution. If the general says 'No', the
revolution continues. Increasingly, the generals are saying 'No'
because their kids are in the crowd.
Thanks to TV
and the Internet, the average 18-year old outside the U.S. is very
savvy about what is going on in the world, especially in terms of
popular culture. There is a huge global consciousness, and young
people around the world want to be a part of it. It is increasingly
apparent to them that the miserable government where they live is
the only thing standing in their way. More and more, it is the
well-educated kids, the children of the generals and the elite, who
are leading the revolutions.
At the same
time, not all is well with the war. The level of violence in Iraq
is much worse and doesn't appear to be improving.
I
would note that contrary to the authors statement, the
conditions in Iraq as of September of 2007 have improved
immensely due to the surge. Sectarian violence and suicide
bombing has significantly diminished. As a result 12 of
the 16 imposed benchmarks have been met. Here are the
facts.
More.... |
It's possible
that we're asking too much of Islam all at one time. We're trying to
jolt them from the 7th century to the 21st century all at once,
which may be further than they can go. They might make it and they
might not. Nobody knows for sure. The point is, we don't know how
the war will turn out. Anyone who says they know is just guessing.
The real
place to watch is Iran. If they actually obtain nuclear weapons it
will be a terrible situation. There are two ways to deal with it.
The first is a military strike, which will be very difficult. The
Iranians have dispersed their nuclear development facilities and put
them underground. The U.S. has nuclear weapons that can go under the
earth and take out those facilities, but we don't want to do that.
The other
way is to separate the radical mullahs from the government, which is
the most likely course of action. Seventy percent of the Iranian
population is under 30. They are Moslem but not Arab. They are
mostly pro-Western. Many experts think the U.S. should have dealt
with Iran before going to war with Iraq. The problem isn't so much
the weapons, it's the people who control them. If Iran has a
moderate government, the weapons become less of a concern.
We don't know
if we will win the war in Iraq. We could lose or win. What we're
looking for is any indicator that Islam is moving into the 21st
century and stabilizing.
2.
China
It may be
that pushing 500 million people from farms and villages into cities
is too much too soon. Although it gets almost no publicity, China is
experiencing hundreds of demonstrations around the country, which is
unprecedented. These are not students in Tiananmen Square. These
are average citizens who are angry with the government for building
chemical plants and polluting the water they drink and the air they
breathe.
The Chinese
are a smart and industrious people. They may be able to pull it off
and become a very successful economic and military superpower. If
so, we will have to learn to live with it. If they want to share
the responsibility of keeping the world's oil lanes open, that's a
good thing. They currently have eight new nuclear electric power
generators under way and 45 on the books to build. Soon, they will
leave the U.S. way behind in their ability to generate nuclear
power.
What can go
wrong with China? For one, you can't move 550 million people into
the cities without major problems. Two, China really wants Taiwan,
not so much for economic reasons, they just want it. The Chinese
know that their system of communism can't survive much longer in the
21st century. The last thing they want to do before they morph into
some sort of more capitalistic government is to take over Taiwan.
We may wake
up one morning and find they have launched an attack on Taiwan. If
so, it will be a mess, both economically and militarily. The U.S.
has committed to the military defense of Taiwan. If China attacks
Taiwan, will we really go to war against them? If the Chinese
generals believe the answer is no, they may attack. If we don't
defend Taiwan, every treaty the U.S. has will be worthless.
Hopefully, China won't do anything stupid.
3.
Demographics
Europe and
Japan are dying because their populations are aging and shrinking.
These trends can be reversed if the young people start breeding.
However, the birth rates in these areas are so low it will take two
generations to turn things around. No economic model exists that
permits 50 years to turn things around. Some countries are
beginning to offer incentives for people to have bigger families.
For example, Italy is offering tax breaks for having children.
However, it's a lifestyle issue versus a tiny amount of money.
Europeans aren't willing to give up their comfortable lifestyles in
order to have more children.
In general,
everyone in Europe just wants it to last a while longer.
Europeans
have a real talent for living. They don't want to work very hard.
The average European worker gets 400 more hours of vacation time per
year than Americans. They don't want to work and they don't want to
make any of the changes needed to revive their economies.
The summer
after 9/11, France lost 15,000 people in a heat wave. In August,
the country basically shuts down when everyone goes on vacation.
That year, a
severe heat wave struck and 15,000 elderly people living in nursing
homes and hospitals died. Their children didn't even leave the
beaches to come back and take care of the bodies. Institutions had
to scramble to find enough refrigeration units to hold the bodies
until people came to claim them. This loss of life was five times
bigger than 9/11 in America, yet it didn't trigger any change in
French society.
When birth
rates are so low, it creates a tremendous tax burden on the young.
Under those circumstances, keeping mom and dad alive is not an
attractive option. That's why euthanasia is becoming so popular in
most European countries. The only country that doesn't permit (and
even encourage) euthanasia is Germany, because of all the baggage
from World War II.
The European
economy is beginning to fracture. Countries like Italy are starting
to talk about pulling out of the European Union because it is
killing them. When things get bad economically in Europe, they tend
to get very nasty politically. The canary in the mine is anti-
Semitism.
When it goes
up, it means trouble is coming. Current levels of anti-Semitism are
higher than ever.
Germany
won't launch another war, but Europe will likely get shabbier, more
dangerous and less pleasant to live in. Japan has a birth rate of
1.3 and has no intention of bringing in immigrants. By 2020, one
out of every five Japanese will be 70 years old. Property values in
Japan have dropped every year for the past 14 years. The country is
simply shutting down. In the U.S. we also have an aging
population. Boomers are starting to retire at a massive rate.
These retirements will have several major impacts:
Possible
massive sell off of large four-bedroom houses and a movement to
condos.
An enormous
drain on the treasury. Boomers vote, and they want their benefits,
even if it means putting a crushing tax burden on their kids to get
them. Social Security will be a huge problem. As this generation
ages, it will start to drain the system. We are the only country in
the world where there are no age limits on medical procedures.
An enormous
drain on the health care system. This will also increase the tax
burden on the young, which will cause them to delay marriage and
having families, which will drive down the birth rate even further.
Although
scary, these demographics also present enormous opportunities for
products and services tailored to aging populations. There will be
tremendous demand for caring for older people, especially those who
don't need nursing homes but need some level of care. Some people
will have a business where they take care of three or four people in
their homes. The demand for that type of service and for products
to physically care for aging people will be huge.
Make sure
the demographics of your business are attuned to where the action
is. For example, you don't want to be a baby food company in Europe
or Japan. Demographics are much underrated as an indicator of where
the opportunities are. Businesses need customers. Go where the
customers are.
4.
Restructuring of American Business
The
restructuring of American business means we are coming to the end of
the age of the employer and employee. With all this fracturing of
businesses into different and smaller units, employers can't
guarantee jobs anymore because they don't know what their companies
will look like next year. Everyone is on their way to becoming an
independent contractor.
The new
workforce contract will be: Show up at my office five days a week
and do what I want you to do, but you handle your own insurance,
benefits, health care and everything else. Husbands and wives are
becoming economic units. They take different jobs and work
different shifts depending on where they are in their careers and
families. They make tradeoffs to put together a compensation
package to take care of the family.
This used to
happen only with highly educated professionals with high incomes.
Now it is happening at the level of the factory floor worker.
Couples at
all levels are designing their compensation packages based on their
individual needs. The only way this can work is if everything is
portable and flexible, which requires a huge shift in the American
economy
The U.S is
in the process of building the world's first 21st century model
economy. The only other countries doing this are U.K.and Australia.
The model is fast, flexible, highly productive and unstable in that
it is always fracturing and re-fracturing. This will increase the
economic gap between the U.S. and everybody else, especially Europe
and Japan.
At the same
time, the military gap is increasing. Other than China, we are the
only country that is continuing to put money into their military.
Plus, we are the only military getting on-the-ground military
experience through our war in Iraq. We know which high-tech weapons
are working and which ones aren't. There is almost no one who can
take us on economically or militarily.
There has
never been a superpower in this position before. On the one hand,
this makes the U.S. a magnet for bright and ambitious people. It
also makes us a target. We are becoming one of the last holdouts of
the traditional Judeo-Christian culture. There is no better place
in the world to be in business and raise children. The U.S. is by
far the best place to have an idea, form a business and put it into
the marketplace.
We take it
for granted, but it isn't as available in other countries of the
world. Ultimately, it's an issue of culture. The only people who
can hurt us are ourselves, by losing our culture. If we give up our
Judeo-Christian culture, we become just like the Europeans.
The
culture war is the whole ballgame. If we lose it, there isn't
another America to pull us out.
|
|
Herbert Meyer
may not yet be that widely known; formerly an associate editor of
FORTUNE, he is an established author and historian, and served as
advisor to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency during
the Reagan Administration. As such, he was responsible for the
creation of the annual National Intelligence Estimate.
Meyer was
also the first man in the United States Government to predict the
collapse of the Soviet Union, for which he later was awarded the
National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal, one of the
intelligence community's high honors.
|
|
| |
|
|
| This page last updated on
Wednesday, July 02, 2008 02:12:11 PM
|
|